Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cultural Geographies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olund, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From savage space to governable space: the extension of United States judicial sovereignty over Indian Country in the nineteenth century

Eric N. Olund

Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

The ways in which Native American communities as well as American society at large are constituted today are in no small part the legacies of the Indian reform era, a period of time spanning the 1880s and 1890s during which the assimilation of Native people and their spaces into the American polity became an explicit project of US governance. This civilizing mission, however, was a double moment in American history, for not only was it intended to reconstitute ‘Indians’ as American citizens through the force of law - it also enabled a certain claim to innocence on the part of American society. In this paper, I explore ways in which the cant of conquest was transformed into the ‘gift’ of civilization through the arguments of reformers, including their appropriations of Native testimony. ‘Indians’ started to become ‘Native Americans’, citizens equal before (US) law in an ostensibly liberal polity, yet this assertion of Native equality was made on the terms of white reformers which erased colonialism from American political discourse.

Cultural Geographies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 129-157 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/1474474002eu240oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. W.J. Withers
History and philosophy of geography, 2002-2003: geography in its place
Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2005; 29(1): 64 - 72.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
D. Mitchell
Cultural landscapes: just landscapes or landscapes of justice?
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2003; 27(6): 787 - 796.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Flint
Political geography: context and agency in a multiscalar framework
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2003; 27(5): 627 - 636.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Nash
Cultural geography: anti-racist geographies
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2003; 27(5): 637 - 648.
[PDF]