This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gagen, E. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Making America flesh: physicality and nationhood in early twentieth-century physical education reform

Department of Geography, University of Hull

At the turn of the twentieth century, urban reformers across the United States became preoccupied with providing recreation facilities for urban children. Municipal park departments, boards of education and local philanthropic associations established supervised playgrounds, recreation parks, and vacation schools, in order to energize America’s youth and transform its fledgling bodies into healthy future citizens. In addition to the daily schedule of physical exercise and games, playground groups also organized a series of exhibitions, field days and parades to demonstrate the positive effects of physical education on the nation’s young bodies. Such demonstrations were overtly patriotic spectacles, incorporating transparently nationalistic rituals and symbols. Rather than focus on the symbolic currency of these events, however, I argue that the scientific logic of physical education renders a symbolic reading quite incongruent. Playgrounds drew from the emerging fields of child psychology and popular theories of psychosocial disorder. From these, a new field of play and physical education theory constructed the development of child consciousness as a mechanical and, more importantly, muscular process. Aspects of character, including national identity, were increasingly sought directly through children’s physicality. The paper therefore rejects the seemingly symbolic function of public spectacles of fitness. Likewise, while recent interventions by non-representational theory might appear to coincide with the psychological rationale of playgrounds, they too must be treated with caution or risk affirming the success of an explicitly nation-building project. Instead, this paper seeks to do justice to the logic of playground reform as a real and potent strategy to produce socially useful subjects without according that logic permanent and efficacious status.

Cultural Geographies, Vol. 11, No. 4, 417-442 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1474474004eu321oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Byrne and J. Wolch Nature, race, and parks: past research and future directions for geographic research Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2009; 33(6): 743 - 765. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Ansell Childhood and the politics of scale: descaling children's geographies? Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 190 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Howell Skatepark as Neoliberal Playground: Urban Governance, Recreation Space, and the Cultivation of Personal Responsibility Space and Culture, November 1, 2008; 11(4): 475 - 496. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Kraftl Young People, Hope, and Childhood-Hope Space and Culture, May 1, 2008; 11(2): 81 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Lorimer Cultural geography: worldly shapes, differently arranged Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2007; 31(1): 89 - 100. [PDF]

				R. Sheehan Running in place Tourist Studies, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 245 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Naylor Historical geography: knowledge, in place and on the move Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 626 - 634. [PDF]