Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Cultural Geographies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A geography of big things

Jane M. Jacobs

Institute of Geography, University of Edinburgh

This paper sketches some conceptual tools by which cultural geographers might advance geographies of architecture. It does so by thinking specifically about one architectural form: the modernist residential highrise, which is the ‘big thing’ of this paper. The paper draws on recent developments in material semiotics in order to interrogate features often uniquely associated with the highrise, such as its global reach, uniformity, and scale. The paper first rethinks how cultural geography has traditionally explained the movement of built forms, explicitly turning from diffusionist accounts to the notion of translation. It then offers a reconsideration of the way geographers might think about scale in relation to a ‘big’ and ‘global’ thing like the modernist highrise, arguing that scale is produced relationally and in specific contexts. Finally, it offers a template for cultural geographical scholarship which takes seriously the technical work entailed in things, like a highrise, materialising or de-materializing. It does so by way of two illustrative stories: one about the productive social science of highrise suicides in Singapore; the other about the destructive role of the inquiry into collapse of Ronan point in the UK.

Cultural Geographies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1-27 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1474474006eu354oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
J. R. Faulconbridge
The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms: Embedding and Emplacing Buildings
Urban Stud, November 1, 2009; 46(12): 2537 - 2554.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
V. della Dora
Travelling landscape-objects
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2009; 33(3): 334 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
H. Lorimer
Cultural geography: non-representational conditions and concerns
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 551 - 559.
[PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
P. Kraftl and J. Horton
Spaces of every-night life: for geographies of sleep, sleeping and sleepiness
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 509 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. Mansvelt
Geographies of consumption: citizenship, space and practice
Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 105 - 117.
[PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
J. M. Jacobs, S. Cairns, and I. Strebel
'A Tall Storey ... but, a Fact Just the Same': The Red Road High-rise as a Black Box
Urban Stud, March 1, 2007; 44(3): 609 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]